But unfortunately, its use in lumbar degenerative disorders is anther story. Also, pedicle screw placement is a technically demanding procedure with a high complication rate. Let's take a look at U.S. FDA's ruling of pedicle screw in 1998:
Globally, surgeons have used pedicle screw to an extent of indiscretion (excuse me, folks, I am not pointing the finger at you.) especially at the degenerative lumbar spines.
12 years later, we have enough literature regarding complications of pedicle screw, of varying severity in 54% of the patients:
1. deep infection: more than 4%. According to my associate, Dr. SH Chen, who once worked at a gigantic spine unit, he said the actual infection rate was around 6%, higher than the reported statistics; some were devastating, resulting in quadriparesis or paraplegia, even death.
2. permanent nerve root Injury: 2.3% . crippled.
3. Misplacement of screw: 11-20% , some were inside the spinal canal.
5. Late backache requiring screw removal: 23%
6. Adjacent segment disease (ASD): 16.5% at five years and 36.1% at ten years, requiring additional surgery.
The rate of symptomatic ASD is higher in patients with transpedicular instrumentation (12.2–18.5%) compared with patients fused with other forms of instrumentation or with no instrumentation (5.2–5.6%)
The sad and grim scientific evidences shown above indicate that we need to rethink the use of pedicle screw, particularly in degenerative lumbar vertebrae.![]() | |
(Left) Deep infection after pedicle screw fixation, Wound Dehiscence . Right: Pus flew out flooding all over the dura sac. (Courtesy of Dr. SH Chen) |
![]() |
Angulation of L1-2 level (ASD), fortunately no nerve injury. 62 years lady. |
![]() |
T12-L1 ASD, 70 years old male, crippled, underwent 4 spine surgeries in 2 years, including once for deep infection. T12-L1 ASD, screw penetrating the disc and all screws were loosened. |
Note: I invented the term: Pedicle Screw Disease, all rights reserved (joke).
沒有留言:
張貼留言